You asked if there
You asked if there were any objections!
picture: dunno source, via our loldog builder. lol caption: aksember
You May Like:
« Previous i is ancient mayan sun god | You always believe Next »
» 31 Comments
Hey, what's with all the misspelled words?
» Learn Lolspeak — teh furst language born of teh intertubes.
Daily Hotdog Email
Subscribe to RSS Feed
-
facebark n myspace!
-
who be barkin?
D.R. on PUPPY DOG EYES Cowdogwah on I tellz him and I tellz him, y… Cowdogwah on Best 10 Cowdogwah on PUPPY DOG EYES I_Love_Goggies on PUPPY DOG EYES sarah on Best 10 landl on Jeff had finally figured … maria on REGRET coyoteman on Best 10 elainet on Neverending story.. D.R. on I tellz him and I tellz him, y… D.R. on Best 10 keshet on Best 10 Morna on I tellz him and I tellz him, y… Stup1dg33kz on If yew dont dew as I sai.…
But I don’t WANNA be first. Now all the cool posters are gunna make fun of me
No mama no, u not get marryed. I keeps all ur attenshuns for mai own self.
Nao i getz dubbel attenshuns! At lease dats wad happen at mai hause wid mai goggies!1
jus sai u do so we can get to teh noms.
doggie has harness?
.
Seeing eye dog
notices somewun has swapped out yr fiance wif anuther
Yur ring bearer gotz fleaz!
Holy God, is the halfway cut-off bridesmaid wearing Tevas?
yes … those are some sad-lookin’ bridesmaids.
but i don wan dis punk as mah new dadee
wait, he gib me hawt dogs all the time? okay den, but onlee this time!
Lissen to goggie, guy, don do it!
Do yu seee?? Guy is offerin treet, bride say NO! Not bode well for guy or gog, imo. =O
When was that wedding? Bride’s dress looks sorta contemporary, but everyone else looks sssooo ’60s! Ew.
you can’t marry him—he’s got a CAT!!!
Simple solution: LEAVE * THE * DOG * AT * HOME!
Clearly one of those ‘cute’ ideas gone wrong. Very wrong. Look at the expressions on everyone’s faces!
Akshully, I tink that’s two moms, not mom n dad.
I’m not sure that’s a “he” on the left.
they’re all women, you can tell by “his” shoes
That’s why I think it looks kinda late ’60s or early ’70s, except for the bride’s gown. Clunky shoes…men did wear them, and some men who are self-conscious about their height (or lack of it) still do wear “lifters.” But the bridesmaids’ shoes and dresses…GACK! And NO stockings! *gasp!* Fish-belly white legs.
I have heard of evil brides who make their attendants dress frumpy on purpose…wonder how long the marriage has lasted.
It’s 70’s kitch…supposed to be oh-so-hip and anti-stylish-stylishness.
Foolish.
Crap.
You’re so right…’tiz crap. Tacky-tacky-tacky. Wonder what it’s like trying to explain their wedding pix to the kids somewhere down the line.
Oh, well. The dog is cute. Only one in the photo who IS! If he really was the ringbearer, he rates a “squeeee!”
Iz ring barer punchings a grumpee??
Low budget affair.
Couldn’t they buy some white paint , maybe some tissue paper to cover the plywood box the minister is standing on?
This is just wrong on so many levels, look at the thing around the “man’s” waist, no man would ever wear that, or shoes like that. Also, look at the “man’s” hand, that is not the hand of a man.
there is so much wrong here- where do we start ? well, i think the picture is flipped- when you face the alter the bride is on the left, as are her attendents- here they are on the rite- also- no one cared enuff to get their hair done ? where is her veil? where are her flowers? the flowers her attendents are holding- just grabbed out of the garden ? i certainly cant see any florist taking responsibility for those “bouquets” !
very sad- no buddy in this group cared very much about what was going on.
I picked my bridal bouquet from my grandmother’s garden. Perhaps not as fancy as something from a florist, but infinitely more meaningful. The whole affair was casual, but I guarantee that we cared very much about what was going on.
Wow, there’s a lot of criticism going on. Maybe they couldn’t afford anything fancy. Or chose to focus on the marriage…not the wedding.
Ohhh…guilt…right. Here’s the thing, I live in a town FILLED with smug hippy wannabees who live off their daddy-set-up trust funds (trustafarians, we call them), and they parade around town bitchin’ about The Man (when their dad IS the man) and how the rest of us are unenlightened boobs since we don’t attend the same yoga class they do. This looks like 100 weddings (or “joinings” or whatever the hell it’s labeled this week) I’ve seen here. IN these cases, it’s a status symbol of hipness, not happiness, or thorough thought about marriage and its commitment. That’s why THIS picture is SO EASY to ridicule. Treating a dog like a person…and demanding that everyone else do so, too…another one of the smuggy attitudes we unruly average people are slapped with on a regular basis.
Yeah, equating a dog with a person is pretty disrespectful to the dog. Sorry you have to live near so many assholes. Be careful. They’re contagious.
nobuddy – permission to use your comment please! and send u bill for coffee
splorted on screen!
Wow. The officiant kinds looks like a gal I knew in grad school, and the setting looks a lot like the International Rose Test Garden in Portland, OR. If this is in fact an Oregon wedding, none of the above observations surprise me…white legs, casual dresses, flowers from the farmers’ market, wedding party members in Tevas, and dogs in the ceremony are par for the course around here…Cottleston Pie is right, what matters is the marriage, not necessarily how fancy the wedding is!
This is definitely a wedding with 2 women. If you notice the strap on the back of the “groom”s coat – it is to provide shape to a woman’s coat – gives the illusion of curves.